Since the Fukushima accident we have seen a stream of experts on radiation telling us not to worry, that the doses are too low, that the accident is nothing like Chernobyl and so forth. They appear on television and we read their articles in the newspapers and online. Fortunately the majority of the public don’t believe them. I myself have appeared on television and radio with these people; one example was Ian Fells of the University of Newcastle who, after telling us all on BBC News that the accident was nothing like Chernobyl (wrong), and the radiation levels of no consequence (wrong), that the main problem was that there was no electricity and that the lifts didn’t work. “ If you have been in a situation when the lifts don’t work, as I have” he burbled on, “you will know what I mean.” You can see this interview on youtube and decide for yourself.
What these people have in common is ignorance. You may think a professor at a university must actually know something about their subject. But this is not so. Nearly all of these experts who appear and pontificate have not actually done any research on the issue of radiation and health. Or if they have, they seem to have missed all the key studies and references. I leave out the real baddies, who are closely attached to the nuclear industry, like Richard Wakeford, or Richard D as he calls himself on the anonymous website he has set up to attack me, “chrisbusbyexposed”.

Ian Fells of the University of Newcastle whoとありますが、whoに対する動詞はどれですか?

telling us all on BBC News とありますが、tellingの目的節がthat以下になって最後のthatはand that
になるはずと思うのですが、どうもそのようになってない。and that the lifts didn’t workのand that は the main problem was に対するthatですよね?

最後に、liftと“chrisbusbyexposed”の意味が分かりません。

宜しくお願いします。

このQ&Aに関連する最新のQ&A

A 回答 (1件)

この回答への補足

リンク先の日本語訳では、whoに対する動詞が「のたまった」になっていますが、原文にはそういう動詞がありません。

補足日時:2011/04/22 18:58
    • good
    • 0

お探しのQ&Aが見つからない時は、教えて!gooで質問しましょう!


このカテゴリの人気Q&Aランキング