However, in 57.1% of the cases there were apical scars, compared to 42.9% in which no scars were observed. しかし，57.1%の症例に頂部瘢痕が認められ，42.9%の症例には瘢痕が認められなかった．この英文の文法的解釈を教えてください。（日本語訳も微妙ならお願いします）全文: https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/applsci/applsci-12-01038/article_deploy/applsci-12-01038.pdf?version=1642664070 まず分解すると However, in 57.1% of the cases there were apical scars, compared to 42.9% in which no scars were observed. ここで in which は 42.9% にかかっているとおもうのですがいかがでしょうか？上記の英文解釈自体が間違っている場合も教えてください。よろしくお願い致します。

However, in 57.1% of the cases there were apical s

解決済

質問者：質問希望
質問日時：2022/05/16 20:42
回答数：2件

However, in 57.1% of the cases there were apical scars, compared to 42.9% in which no scars were observed.

しかし，57.1%の症例に頂部瘢痕が認められ，42.9%の症例には瘢痕が認められなかった．

この英文の文法的解釈を教えてください。（日本語訳も微妙ならお願いします）

全文: https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/applsci/applsc …

まず分解すると

However, in 57.1% of the cases there were apical scars, compared to 42.9% in which no scars were observed.

ここで

in which

は

42.9%

にかかっているとおもうのですが

いかがでしょうか？

上記の英文解釈自体が間違っている場合も教えてください。

よろしくお願い致します。